Old Testament Gospel Doctrine Lesson 18: Joshua at the Banks of the Jordan

You can’t conquer Canaan.

The other ten spies were absolutely correct. The Canaanites were too established, too numerous, too big to fight. A band of squabbling tribes that just spent forty years sleeping in tents didn’t have a chance against them. That’s the point. They haven’t had a chance since the firstborn of Egypt were sacrificed for their freedom. Seas and deserts and armies have been in front of them, each one more than enough for the (almost certainly less than five million strong) host of Israel. Yet here we are. The Jordan River.

Your ancestors lived here, Joshua. Were they better men than you? Will your name be spoken in the same hushed tones as theirs are? Will the trial that breaks the sons of Abraham happen on your watch? If you were Moses you would have been leading them already, but Moses is gone, and it’s up to the son of Nun to walk the last mile.

The lesson of a lifetime. You must learn to walk to the edge of the light, and then a few steps into the darkness; then the light will appear and show the way before you. Does the Lord tell Joshua every detail of the conquest of Canaan? Does he need to? A fearful man could know the Lord’s plan and still flub it. Believe me, it happens. Knowledge isn’t necessary. What is required is to be strong and of good courage, and to walk the Ark into the Jordan, and feel the water deepen around your ankles.

And down the walls tumble. The sons of Abraham are once more established in righteousness, in freedom, in the fear of the Lord. And Joshua stands before the ashes of Jericho, before the booty of Canaan, the fields they did not plant and the houses they did not build and the slaves they did not hire, and he asks his folk to make the decision he already made, before ever the sword of the exile rang in these cities of giants – Who will you serve?

And they tried to remember, and they nearly did, and when the long-promised Messiah came to that oft-conquered land he did not bear the name of Abraham the father or Moses the liberator or Aaron or David or Solomon. The name on the tablet on the bottom of the living-water river is Jesus, Yeshua, Joshua, the name of a man who faced an impossible task but was strong and of good courage.

Women Are The True Victims Of The Racist Ban On Blacks In The Mormon Church

While Mormon leaders met with NAACP leaders this week to heal the racial rift that white female journalists in Utah all agree still exists in the church, journalists were understandably fooled by a fake website and tweeted out fake news instead of reporting on the meeting. Hey, it was a convincing-looking website, give us a break! We’re just journalists! But the great thing about it is the Salt Lake Tribune went viral with a story on this fake website and the meeting was totally forgotten. This is how progressive journalism makes the world a better place.

But let’s talk about the priesthood ban for a second.

Did you know that until 1978 the Mormon church excluded African-Americans from priesthood positions? This is a well-kept secret, but I think racism from almost 50 years ago is something we need to talk about more, every hour instead of merely every couple of days. It happened, and the question is how do we move past it?

Well, the Democrats fought fiercely to keep slavery in America, but now it is the Republicans who are racists. How did that happen? How did the Democrats wake up one day absolved of their original sin and Republicans who fought against slavery became the bad guys? Because Democrats took it far further than just freeing slaves. We need to obsessively make the cause about much more than just what it is really about. Today, the fight against slavery means college admissions for kids that don’t perform well but get it because of their skin color. Republicans who oppose this are racists.

The same applies to Mormons. Who still doesn’t have priesthood leadership positions? Women. That’s right, women. We can move past the racism debacle, comfort our Black brothers and sisters, and progress as a church if we signal our virtue and make it all about feminism. So while I admire the creator of this fake news website for distracting from real news, it was ultimately not helpful because it turned the narrative back to being all about race, when it really should be about feminists. Every morning, all Mormon women in the world wake up with tears in their eyes because they have different roles and responsibilities than men in the church and are not standing up at the pulpit receiving respect and adulation of the congregation.

We are the true victims of that policy and we need everybody to be constantly reminded of this.

Gospel Doctrine Lesson 17: The Subtle Art of Not Forgetting

I’ve got a pet peeve about gospel discussions where we sagely shake our heads at how ridiculous the people in these scripture stories are. We look at the pride cycle, at Laman and Lemuel seeing an angel and immediately rebelling, at the Israelites complaining about all that manna they get to eat. We imagine that we, enlightened Latter-day Saints who are capable of fasting once a month when we remember it and sacrificing a Saturday for a temple trip now and then, would do better in those situations.

I don’t mean to call modern Saints weak, or even, for many of us, particularly untested. I mean to suggest that the scriptures are meant for us to self-insert as the forgetful ones. It’s not normal to remember. This selective amnesia we read about is the default – as we find when we remember those commandments that are hard for us, that we haven’t taken from burdens to habits to blessings yet. Imagine the Saints of the future reading about you, and the commandments you haven’t kept, and gently chuckling as they think about poor so-and-so, who forgot.

The Ancient Israel we read about in Deuteronomy this week isn’t some tribe of losers God is leading along to show off his power to save even the bumblers – if it were, he’d be the butt of the joke. This Israel is God’s A-team, a nation of righteous supermen pruned by divine eugenics from the most righteous man to walk the Earth, and they still are so forgetful they need God to make special reminder headbands for them. The Exodus was a series of events based on shocking fear of God into the children of Israel so hard their great-grandkids would still be punch-drunk. There were many in that Host more righteous than you.

But they were men, not gods, and they lost their privileges, and they lost their faith, and they lost their promised land. As you could yours, and your grandchildren could leave the church and their children could grow up not knowing what a Mormon is. Hell is before us all.

The story of Alma the Younger is not about how powerful angels are in developing one’s testimony. It’s about how amazing Alma was for keeping his, even after an angel visited him, and the struggle he made even for that. And that struggle is available to you.

You can remember. You can carve this law in your heart. Hell does not have to prevail. Just don’t imagine you can get away from Babylon at a walking pace.

5 Ways Young Woman Leaders Should Stifle Boys In The New LDS Youth Program

1. Always Put Girls First

Insults naturally bounce off men but little acts of contempt slowly wear out their self-esteem. This what I have found. So if women leaders hire only women at the workplace, give only girls a good grade in the classroom, and constantly demean male members of the scout pack, this will go a long way to not only empower girls but also crush the male spirit. You can do this in scouting by picking only girls to lead the troops, picking girls to decide activities, and only praising the achievements of girls. It’s time to clip the Eagle Scouts’ wings.

2. Demean Male Behavior

It is no secret that men tend to have behaviors that lead to wars, crime, and aggression. It is important to know that parents are to blame for not programming their children to be more like girls. You can fix the mistakes of parents by taking the leading role in shaping their children’s lives. The great thing is people can be programmed to behave however you want. This is why I always attack males for reckless behavior and violent sports, like baseball and hockey. Throughout the history of scouting, there has been appallingly violent behavior that we need to put a stop to. No more camp fires and hikings. In fact, did you know the general idea for scouting was established from the Beor War which introduced concentration camps to the world? I’m glad that we got rid of this toxic organization and have a new youth program to shape around the ideals of equality. So never miss an opportunity to shame anyone for masculine behavior. You might even have to remind the Bishop to check his privilege and allow us to create a safe space for our young sisters. Continue reading “5 Ways Young Woman Leaders Should Stifle Boys In The New LDS Youth Program”

A Just Mercy

Similarities and Difference

We all have some things in common: we are all children of God, each on of us born with a purpose, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ died for each one of us, and each one of us will one day stand before God and give an accounting of our lives. Yet each of us comes from a huge variety of life experience; a few examples:

  • Some people are born into wealth with a world of opportunity and few material challenges at their feet. Some people are born in abject poverty with barely a chance to stay alive.
  • Some people are born into safe nurturing environments with many opportunities for growth. Some are born into nightmarish circumstances with challenges few of us can imagine and even fewer can relate to.
  • Some people are born with hereditary challenges that make keeping God’s commandments a greater burden than for others.

Most of us fall somewhere in between these extremes. Multiply these differences the world over and our variety of life experience is nearly infinite. Continue reading “A Just Mercy”

The Boy Scouts Is Quickly Becoming Like Hitler’s Youth

Why did they push the Mormons out? As the Boy Scouts changes names to “Scouts BSA” (though at this point they might as well call themselves Soy Scouts) many former scouts are asking this question.

Why did BSA decide to antagonize a religion that made up 20% of their organization? BSA has been losing members and income every year, so why would they push away the fastest growing demographic of members in the organization?

Maybe they are just making terrible business decisions? Organizations have been known to push away their base for the sake of political correctness, after all. But looking at BSA’s strategy for growth, this business decision doesn’t just appear idiotic, it’s plain suicidal.

Continue reading “The Boy Scouts Is Quickly Becoming Like Hitler’s Youth”

Gospel Doctrine Lesson 16: Look, A Talking Donkey!

Last week we left the Children of Israel absolutely face-wrecking the Amorites, man they gave them a canonically legendary curbstomp and gave us some important lessons on sustaining our leaders and looking to God to boot. This week we’re changing focus from the rampaging Israelite horde to their victims.

The camera pulled back at the end of the Amorite war in Numbers 21, sort of the literary version of a camera rolling over burned villages and an artfully placed abandoned doll, and now we zoom in on the Moabites, who are sore afraid, as they should be.1in 22:4 we find that Christians ACTUALLY BELIEVE cows eat grass by licking it; science has proved that cows bite grass, checkmate theists

Balak, king of the Moabites, summons his soothsayer Balaam, who may have been a righteous priesthood holdout like Jethro, though they do bring him silver to cross his palm.2Maybe the rewards of divination were just viewed as payment, some sort of tithing? Maybe details were embellished or added by someone who thought it’d be obvious they treat a prophet like a fortune-teller? Maybe the Lord just worked through soothsayers at this place and time? Balak is being a good king, providing for the welfare of Moab and not relying on the arm of the flesh, but preserving Moab is not the Lord’s plan right now.

Continue reading “Gospel Doctrine Lesson 16: Look, A Talking Donkey!”

We Need Common-Sense Prom Dress Control Laws, Now!

It was the photo that shocked the world!

A teenage white girl assumed  she could wear clothing that looked like clothing that non-white girls wear. She actually wore a Chinese dress! It’s 2018! Did she think nobody would notice her racism? Did she think it just wouldn’t affect anybody around her?

I’ll never forget where I was when I first saw the photo. Me and my friend from upper-east side Manhattan were sipping soy espressos at the Gateway Mall in Salt Lake, discussing the historical oppression of Chinese railway workers by white middle-class high school girls. Then the news broke. There she was, crouched with young men above her flashing violent gang signs. I literally spat out my drink.

For years, progressive women around the country have called for common sense laws to prevent this kind of racism.

Recently the Senate defeated a measure to require background checks on women who purchase dresses at fashion shows or on the internet. They defeated it even though 70-90% of Americans support measures which would eliminate existing loopholes and prevent racist Americans of white skin color from encroaching on marginalized cultures. Right now, you can literally walk into a fashion show and buy any dress you want, with no background check! Even if you are a felon or have a history of mental illness!

Did they not see the thousands of grass-roots Americans across the country who skipped class to protest these kinds of intolerable atrocities in our schools? Enough is enough! White girls cannot just wear anything they want.  It is time to stand up to the fashion lobby and stop racists from wearing clothing that offends people around them.

As feminist Mormons, we understand that it is hateful to focus on the dresses women wear instead of the women’s achievements. But that only applies to dresses that offend non-marginalized men. Modesty standards teach women not to choose clothing that would give men “unrighteous” thoughts, as if it is women’s fault what men decide to think. So when a woman spontaneously decides to wear a dress that just happens to show cleavage, that makes her responsible for the clothes she is wearing? We are only responsible for our appearance if it offends minorities–or at least if CNN tells us it should offend them.

Women everywhere are saying “we need to get past these patriarchal rules and encourage women to wear whatever they want! Except clothes that offend nonwhites, and female Islamic clothing.”

Luckily this time, a cyber-sleuth saw the photo and alerted everyone, so that a collective mob of angry social justice warriors could shame and harass this girl for wearing a dress that kinda has a Chinese motiff. But what we need is our leaders in Washington to act to preserve the rights of marginalized and oppressed communities. We need media platforms to more effectively harass people and to get high schoolers to protest against their own best interest.

Isn’t it about time?

‘As Feminists In Zion…’

As anyone who has attended a public school in America ought to know, women are horribly oppressed by the patriarchy.  We are always pushed down. Always sent to the back of the line.

What is the patriarchy? It is important to know “patriarchy” doesn’t just refer to men. There are plenty of men, even in Utah, who are weak simps, who coddle women and follow our orders every minute of every waking day. I hate them too, but that’s not what I’m talking about. Patriarchy refers to the bishop who sits in a comfy chair and lounges about sipping lemonade all Sunday while you suffer through three hours of church. It is the male college student who effortlessly surfs through college and is destined to high wages and a happier life while you are forced to pay money for feminine hygiene products. The patriarchy is a terrible force of darkness in each of our lives, and we must transform into Social Justice Warriors if we are going to save the world. So gear up!

I am excited for this opportunity to repeat dry sociology theories and radicalize women in the church, particularly among the youth. Sure, I get paid by a male billionaire oligarch to write this, and this platform only exists because Socialism is good for his financial bottom line, but in the end–I am sure–a woman will be sitting in that chair one day making all the decisions. And then it will all be worth it.

As a feminist, I think different. I swim opposite stream from the rest of the fish–unless you are talking about the 52% of America that agrees with everything I say, of course.  My message is in complete conformity with every school textbook in America , with popular culture, with most college professors, with the Leftist communications instructors at BYU-I, with every newspaper and mainstream news source in the country–and that means I think different. That means I think smartly.

So Sisters, join me! Join me on the path of courage! The path of coolness! You can even bring your male partner and male offspring, as long as they are docile and easily controlled. Assuming you haven’t divorced your husband yet or given your son a sex change. I mean, I hate them and I don’t want them reading anything I have to say, but if it turns them into Socialists, that can’t be bad.

We live in a culture that suppresses this kind of free-thinking discussion and punishes open debate. Like, every time I wear pants to church, I get funny glances from one or two other ward members, and then I am reminded of how intolerant and close-minded they all are. They all literally hate me because I am a woman and think for myself. Even though I didn’t come up with the idea of wearing pants, and it is a meaningless idea that has no relevance to anything, it is important because it is my idea. It is my choice, and my choice is more important than anything else.

So come with me, sisters, and bring your dissenting voices! Have the courage to say “I oppose”! Carry this great new ideology with you to your ward meetings, your Sunday School lessons, your potlucks, your church dances, Seminary, and everywhere you go. This ideology of love.

Just as long as you don’t say a swear word. We have to be nice quiet Mormons after all.

You Didn’t Join a Suicide Cult

WWJD: Feed a stranger & starve his kids?

Let’s return to the early days of the European migrant crisis. I had shared an article by Molly Hemingway entitled: “3 Tips For A More Civil Conversation About Syrian Refugees”. I received a fiery rebuttal to Mrs. Hemingway’s tips from an acquaintance, they especially took exception the following in the article:

“Thomas Aquinas discusses whether there is an order to charity. Must we love everyone in outward effects equally? Or do we demonstrate love more to our near neighbors than our distant neighbors? His answers: No to the first question, yes to the second.”

To summarize my acquaintance’s rebuttal, it went something like this.

“You and Thomas Aquinas are cherry picking your Christianity. You are totally ignoring the Gospel’s teachings that Christian love lacks any conditions. It literally says stuff like “love those that hurt you”. The point is that your sister or a sinner or a Syrian refugee are, in fact, equal in the eyes of God and certainly in terms of Christian charity. There is no coherent argument against this without obscuring or ignoring the gospels. From a Christian perspective, we should give all we have, to help the destitute. In the Christian ethic, even if all the refugees were known terrorists, we should help them.”

This is a perfect distillation of the shaming patriotic Christians with a sense of national identity face. It is a very Alinsky tactic whose fourth rule is “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.” It is a tactic that can be applied to any idealistic movement. Now to be fair, my friend is not a disciple of Alinsky, but we have been bathed in Alinsky for at least two generations. Reading the Gospels alone and in a vacuum one could be forgiven coming away with that interpretation of Christ’s teachings. Take for example Luke 6:27-30:

“…Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,

“Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you.

“And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also.

“Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again.

When considered literally and in isolation, how do you reconcile these with raising a family, with maintaining a nation, or even with something as basic as surviving a winter? I’d like to try and make the case that there is a sustainable Christian approach to charity, and that Christ was not calling us to join an altruistic suicide cult. I’d also like to address some particularly Mormon struggles with this line of argument.

Virtuous Tensions

First, let me make some personal reflections on these teachings of Jesus:

I believe these are to be considered general words of wisdom in dealing with our neighbors, family members, and brothers and sisters in Christ. When these teachings are taken literally things break down quickly. For example, how do we “give to every man that asketh” of us and then practically feed our children? These are children we have been commanded to “replenish the earth” with (Genesis 1:28). These are children who are called in the Psalms “an heritage of the Lord” (Psalm 127:3). The same Jesus teaches that even we, the wicked and fallen, know that we should not answer the pleas of our child for bread by giving them a stone (Luke 11:11). At some point one must say no or we will be broken and destitute, incapable of helping anyone – even our children. I believe here Christ is asking us to be generous in spirit, to strive for a charitable heart, and to not live life by a strict reciprocal ledger.

This reading does imply that there should be an order to charity and the other virtues encouraged in these passages in Luke, and I think this interpretation is supported by other recorded words of Christ and even more clearly by the Apostle Paul.

For instance, Jesus instructs us to turn the other cheek. Is this a literal call to non-violence? Reading elsewhere in the same book of Luke, before Jesus and his apostles go to the olive grove to pray, Christ asks his apostles to purchase swords:

“Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

“For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned among the transgressors: for the things concerning me have an end.

“And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, It is enough.” [Luke 22:36-38]

These verses are a moment when Christ is fulfilling the prophecy in Isaiah 53:12, and there is a lot more going on in these verses, but I’d like to narrowly focus on one element: His disciples never went and sold their garments to obtain the swords because they already had two swords. Why did Jesus suffer his disciples to travel with him prepared with these weapons of violence if self-defense is a sin? The answer is clear: because it isn’t sinful to protect yourself and your loved ones from violent physical aggression. What is righteous is not escalating conflicts tit-for-tat within your community and family.

Your child died, it’s your fault, and you never went to the funeral

Secondly, we must properly understand the limits of what our shared divine parentage obligates us to do.

Going back to the refugee crisis, how do we as Christians look at the infamous and tragic images of the three-year-old who drowned attempting to reach Europe with his family, and then say no to the next three-year-old doing the same? Especially when “we are all children of God”; when “We are all brothers and sisters”. This is a particularly difficult struggle for Latter-Day Saints. Our whole cosmology emphasizes our shared origin as spirit children of Heavenly Parents, and that we globally, past, present, and future share a divine purpose. This background makes it challenging for modern, western, Latter Day Saints to vote for nationalist policies, or to think as a people with moral self-interests. It is also easily, and frequently, exploited by those seeking to push a Cultural Marxist, multicultural agenda on the historical pioneer stock of Deseret. Just watch a twitter stream of #LDSconf during general conference as an example.

This universal humanism robed in religious language can be countered with a proper reading of the 5th chapter of Paul’s letter to Timothy. We must consider that Christ’s gospels were not only recorded by his apostles, but they were then applied by them as well. I believe the first Apostles and early Christians struggled, as we do, to practically apply Jesus’ teachings that are often in tension with one another. However, because they had the fortune to have learned at Christ’s feet, we should study their interpretation and practice carefully. What does Paul write to Timothy?

“But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” [1 Timothy 5:8]

Let me attempt to recreate a recent conversation with my children regarding this passage. We had just been over a history lesson, and we were gathered around the computer talking about groups of people being at war with one another.

My daughter made the observation: “So everyone has been fighting their own brothers and sisters.”

“Why?” I responded, “Is it because we are all God’s children?”

“Yes,” she replied.

“That’s true, but we aren’t all the same kind of brother and sister. God sent you kids to mom and I, and that means you should be special to us.”

I then asked her to read Timothy 5:8 out loud and asked her, “Who is our “own” who is our “house”? Our own is our family right here. God is telling us we can’t make someone else more important than our family.”

“Our immediate family, right?” she asked.

“Yeah then after mom and I take care of you, if we have the ability to help, we help our neighbors and our extended family, then our Ward, then our town, then our State, then our Country and then the World.”

I must have been miming concentric circles because she piped in with:    “Like a bullseye!”

I then asked my son: “What if I said hey buddy, everybody is God’s children so I’m leaving you all here and,” flipping to the other side of the Google Maps globe, “helping some kids here. Bye! I don’ t know when I’ll be back, good luck getting money for food.”

“Nooooo!” He shouted.

“But, we are all God’s children!” I rhetorically replied.

My daughter jumped in, “But we are your children. God sent us to you!”

“Right! And God taught us to help our family first. Because the best way to help the world and God’s kingdom is to have a strong family. Then strong neighbors and extended family and so on. Like the bullseye.”

Sadly, it isn’t just children that need this basic order of obligation taught to them, far too many Latter-Day Saints, at least abstractly, think their obligations to Afghan children are morally equivalent to their own children. Paul was teaching how to practically apply the Christian charity Jesus taught.

Love as Virtue and Vice

Thirdly, Love is a virtue, the greatest, but like all virtues it can be malformed with excessive zeal.

Aristotle taught that virtues were a proper balance of behavior or feeling in a specific sphere. For instance, the sphere of confidence and fear: a proper balance in this sphere would be the virtue of courage. A deficit in this sphere would be cowardice and an excess would be rashness or foolhardiness. We can apply this to the question of charity. Charity in the bible is typically a translation of the Greek word for love. We are taught by Jesus that second only to loving God we are to love our neighbor (which in the Greek means those near you). If we are to view the sphere of love in this context of excess and deficit what would it be?

Selfishness <—- LOVE —-> Enablement

Enablement here is meant in its very modern sense. If we possess this excess of love, we are so selfless and “others focused” that we prioritize the other above all else we value. The pathologies of the target of our enablement are not considered; indeed, in this state of enablement they are even desired. The saying “the squeaky wheel gets the grease” is recast as: “The squeaky wheel gets the grease, BUT if I have nothing squeaking in m y life I’ll make sure to find or create something squeaky to “virtuously” burden myself with”.

Also, in this state of excessive love even those natural and healthy extensions of yourself must be sacrificed to the other. There was one mother I was acquainted with that embodies this excess of love. She had two biological children and anywhere from five to six very troubled adopted/foster kids at a time. She helped many kids out of terrible situations, but in turn her natural children were constantly subject to high levels of stress, drama, and constant babysitting of very troubled children. There was real resentment. In her efforts to help troubled foster children, she sacrificed the well-being of her biological children. Needless to say, her position on the refugee crisis was predictable.

Righteous love must be properly ordered, and we must mediate the competing goods with wisdom. Jesus teaches us to order our Love: First God, then our neighbor as our self.

More specifically on loving our neighbor Christ told the well-known parable of “The Good Samaritan” to answer the question, “who is my neighbor”. The Samaritan was a traveler on a highway who by chance encountered a traveler from Jerusalem in immediate and genuine distress after being attacked by thieves. The victim had already been passed by and ignored in his plight by two prominent Jewish travelers. The Samaritan dressed the man’s wounds and concluded that he had the means to pay for his lodgings for a time. Jesus concludes the parable by asking the lawyer who was a neighbor to the victim? The lawyer answers that it was the Samaritan who showed mercy. Jesus then commands us to do likewise.

We learn two things from the parable. One obvious the other not so obvious. First, less obviously is that not everyone is our neighbor, only those that act neighborly are our neighbors. Second, and more obviously is that Christ would have us “do … likewise” and be the merciful neighbor. However, like the Samaritan we must place this call to act as a good neighbor in a context of ordered virtuous tensions. Note that nowhere in the story does he invite the highwaymen who beat and robbed the victim into his own lands. Neither does he abandon his business to stay and personally care for the victim. He generously and practically helps the victim.

Welcome back to church

Again, Christ’s church is not an altruistic suicide cult! It is a church, the kingdom of god, built on the rock of Christ and his Priesthood. God did not want us to immolate ourselves, our families, and His church on a pyre of radical selflessness. If so, there would be no point in commanding us to be fruitful, there would be no need to establish a priesthood order; his church would be built on a foundation of sand.

The prophet David O’McKay famously taught: “…no other success can compensate for failure in the home.” It would seem to me that would include subordinating the needs of your children and family to another person’s child and family, or worse another nation and people’s children.